I detest Muslim Dhimmi and Taqiyya semantics that say "Any religion can generate a terrorist." This is only obscurely true when those religions are persecuted.  


Only ONE religion requires JIHAD. As I said previously about Islamic "terrorism" that is a semantic trick, since any time a Muslim kills a non-muslim or an apostate muslim, for ANY reason whatsoever, he doing service to Allah, it is Jihad. 

As much as I appreciate Donald Trump for chiding the democrats, especially Obama for his inability to utter the words "Radical Islamic Terrorism" it is an idea that is almost as dangerous as George Bush's LIE, "Islam means Peace."  Mr. Trump there is NOTHING RADICAL about Islamic Terror, is has a 1400 year history and is TAUGHT in the core of Islam via the Koran, the Sira and Hadiths and is echoed by Imams around the entire world, every single day.

In ISLAM it is impossible for a Muslim to kill a non-muslim, "unjustly." In Sharia compliant countries, he cannot be charged with murder, and in other less Sharia compliant, Muslim Countries, he can escape the murder charge by a "sharia court" specified financial payment to his victims family, usually a few hundred dollars or less.

The murders the Boston Bombers committed prior to the Boston bombing were JIHAD. 

Remember this, when the psycho-political manipulators are waxing poetic about whether something is or is not "terrorism." THAT IS A MEANINGLESS CONVERSATION.  You want to know was it Jihad or not? That is, was it a Muslim killing a non-muslim, or an apostate muslim. If it was, it is Jihad.